(8 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 4 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 2:
Zeile 2:
}}
}}
[[Datei:P_ID2122__Mob_A_1_2.png|right|frame|PDF of lognormal fading]]
[[Datei:EN_Mob_A1_2.png|right|frame|PDF of lognormal fading]]
We consider a mobile radio cell in an urban area and a vehicle that is approximately at a fixed distance $d_0$ from the base station. For example, it moves on an arc around the base station.
We consider a mobile radio cell in an urban area and a vehicle that is approximately at a fixed distance $d_0$ from the base station. For example, it moves on an arc around the base station.
Thus the total path loss can be described by the following equation:
Thus the total path loss can be described by the following equation:
* Or use the interaction module provided by $\rm LNTwww$ [[Applets:Komplementäre_Gaußsche_Fehlerfunktionen|Komplementäre Gaußsche Fehlerfunktionen]].
* Or use the interaction module provided by $\rm LNTwww$ [[Applets:Komplementäre_Gaußsche_Fehlerfunktionen_(neues_Applet)|Komplementäre Gaußsche Fehlerfunktionen]].
Zeile 59:
Zeile 58:
'''(1)''' The correct answer is <u>YES</u>:
'''(1)''' The correct answer is <u>YES</u>:
*From the $\rm dB$–value $V_0 = 80 \ \rm dB$ follows the absolute (linear) value $K_0 = 10^8$. Thus the received power is
*From the $\rm dB$–value $V_0 = 80 \ \rm dB$ follows the absolute (linear) value $K_0 = 10^8$. Thus the received power is
[[File:P_ID2187__Mob_A_1_2c_v1.png|right|frame|loss due to lognormal fading]]
The graphic illustrates the result.
The graphic illustrates the result.
*The probability density $f_{\rm VS}(V_{\rm S})$ of the path loss due to shadowing (Longnormal–Fading) is shown here.
*The probability density $f_{\rm VS}(V_{\rm S})$ of the path loss due to shadowing (Longnormal–Fading) is shown here.
*The probability that the system will fail is marked in red:
*The probability that the system will fail is marked in red.
<br clear=all>
<br clear=all>
'''(4)''' From the availability probability $99.9 \%$ follows the default probability $10^{\rm –3} \approx \ {\rm Q}(3)$.
'''(4)''' From the availability probability $99.9 \%$ follows the failure probability $10^{\rm –3} \approx \ {\rm Q}(3)$.
*If the distance-dependent path loss $V_0$ is reduced by $10 \ \ \rm dB$ to $\underline {70 \ \rm dB}$, a failure will only occur when $V_{\rm S} ≥ 50 \ \ \rm dB$.
*If the distance-dependent path loss $V_0$ is reduced by $10 \ \ \rm dB$ to $\underline {70 \ \rm dB}$, a failure will only occur when $V_{\rm S} ≥ 50 \ \ \rm dB$.
*This would achieve exactly the required reliability, as the following calculation shows:
*This would achieve exactly the required reliability, as the following calculation shows:
$${\rm Pr}({\rm "System\hspace{0.15cm} does not work\hspace{0.15cm}"})=
We consider a mobile radio cell in an urban area and a vehicle that is approximately at a fixed distance $d_0$ from the base station. For example, it moves on an arc around the base station.
Thus the total path loss can be described by the following equation:
The probability density $f_{\rm VS}(V_{\rm S})$ of the path loss due to shadowing (Longnormal–Fading) is shown here.
The probability that the system will fail is marked in red.
(4) From the availability probability $99.9 \%$ follows the failure probability $10^{\rm –3} \approx \ {\rm Q}(3)$.
If the distance-dependent path loss $V_0$ is reduced by $10 \ \ \rm dB$ to $\underline {70 \ \rm dB}$, a failure will only occur when $V_{\rm S} ≥ 50 \ \ \rm dB$.
This would achieve exactly the required reliability, as the following calculation shows: